Introduction to MLOps for Startups: Getting More Done with Less
Your ML models aren’t useless; they’re just stuck.
You’ve made a very good machine learning model. Your accuracy numbers look great. Your group is happy. Then you wake up and realize that the model is in a Jupyter notebook and has nothing to do with your users. Welcome to the “Model Graveyard,” where 60% of machine learning projects fail before they are put into use.

A lot of new businesses end up here. You have smart engineers, not much money, and a lot of hype about AI. But there is a huge gap between the code and the customers. You have to train models, put them into use, keep an eye on how well they work, and retrain them when they stop working well, all without hiring a lot of DevOps experts or spending all your money on cloud bills.
MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) is the answer to that problem.
This post is for you if you’re a founder, CTO, or engineer at a startup and you’re wondering how to get your models into production without spending as much as Netflix or Google. We’ll show you how MLOps really works for small teams, where money is wasted, and give you proven tips from startups that are doing it right. By the end, you’ll know why MLOps is a must for any serious AI startup and how to do it without spending a lot of money.
What you’ll learn:
Why MLOps is a competitive advantage for you, not a cost drain
What makes DevOps and MLOps different (they’re not the same)
Tools and strategies that are cheap and work for scrappy teams
A real-life example of how good MLOps saved a startup $50,000 a month
Real answers to the questions that every new business has about AI
What is MLOps, really?
Let’s start with the boring truth: MLOps is just good software engineering that works with machine learning.
DevOps as we know it today is all about taking application code, automating its deployment, and making sure it runs smoothly in production. MLOps takes that idea and applies it to machine learning workflows, which are more complicated because they involve data, models, experiments, and continuous retraining, not just code.
This is the main difference:
DevOps is all about code. Your app stays stable after you release version 1.0. You send out updates, but the app always works the same way.
Models and data are the main things that MLOps works with. Your model that was trained on data from yesterday might not work as well today. Things in the real world change. People act in different ways. Your model gets worse. You need to keep an eye on things all the time, retrain them automatically, and have smart rollback systems in place, all without waking up your whole team at 3 AM.
Think of MLOps as the pipes that make your AI work. It’s not showy. No one celebrates it. But without it, your model will eventually fail without anyone knowing, give real users bad predictions, and ruin trust in your product.
What’s ironic? Startups that use MLOps correctly move faster and spend less than those that don’t.
The Three Most Common Misunderstandings About MLOps
Myth 1: “We need enterprise MLOps platforms that cost $500,000 a year”
No, you don’t need to. Most enterprise platforms are made for businesses that have hundreds of teams working on thousands of models. Your startup probably needs one platform that is easy to understand, easy to keep up with, and only grows when you’re ready.
The best thing is? MLflow, Kubeflow, and DVC are all open-source tools that are free. They don’t belong in the “second class” because they power a lot of startups and are used by a lot of businesses.
Myth 2: “MLOps takes the place of Data Scientists and ML Engineers”
MLOps is a specialization, not a replacement. You will need people who know how to set up and monitor ML pipelines and deployment infrastructure. But AI will not get rid of the job; it will make it better. Like CI/CD didn’t kill developers, it made them more productive.
The Emerging Jobs report from LinkedIn says that MLOps jobs have grown 9.8 times in five years. The field is also adding new areas of expertise, such as FinOps (cost optimisation for AI) and AIOps (AI for IT operations).
Myth 3: “We’ll figure out how to make it later. Let’s just train models now.”
This is how technical debt happens in real life. It costs five to ten times more to fix a broken deployment pipeline or add monitoring after the fact than it does to build it in from the start. Startups that don’t think about MLOps until later always say that it takes longer to get to market and costs more to build infrastructure.
What is the real difference between MLOps and DevOps?
The way they work is very different, even though they sound the same.

DevOps and MLOps are two different things.
| Feature | DevOps | MLOps |
| Main Artifact | Application code and binaries | Models, datasets, features, and hyperparameters |
| Versioning | Code repository (Git) | Code + Data + Model + Config (needs special tools like DVC) |
| Deployment | Build → Test → Deploy (fairly stable) | Build → Train → Validate → Deploy → Monitor → Retrain (iterative and data-driven) |
| Monitoring | Performance of the application (uptime, latency, errors) | Model (accuracy, drift, data degradation) |
| Redeployment Trigger | Engineers push new code | Data drift is found, performance threshold is crossed, or retraining is scheduled. |
| Testing Complexity | Unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests | Unit tests plus data validation, model performance tests, and bias/fairness checks |
| Dependencies | Standard libraries | Runtimes, GPUs, certain CUDA versions, ML frameworks, and data pipelines |
The main point is that MLOps needs to keep an eye on changes in data and model behavior, not just code changes. This is a lot harder than regular DevOps.
A Case Study on the Real Cost of Doing MLOps Wrong
Let’s make this real.
A fintech startup in Series A built a fraud detection model and put it on AWS using a standard machine learning setup. No checking. No versioning. No automatic retraining.
In just eight weeks, their monthly cloud bill rose to $50,000.
This is where the money went:
$20,000 a month for GPU instances for inference (running at full capacity 24/7)
Fees for moving data in and out of S3: $8,000 per month
Kubernetes cluster overhead: $12,000 a month for a system they didn’t fully understand.
$6,000 a month for storage for model artifacts and logs
Time spent on manual debugging and operations: priceless
The real model worked well. The problem was that the infrastructure was too big, with expensive instances running all the time, no auto-scaling, no cost optimisation, and no way to check where the money was going.
What did they do? They:
Changed to a decentralized GPU infrastructure, which saved 70% on computing power.
Used MLflow to keep track of experiments and model versions (which cut down on data clutter)
Added automated retraining pipelines so they wouldn’t have to pay for old models anymore.
Set up alerts for costs in their cloud provider
Same model, same level of accuracy. The new bill is $8,000 a month.
That’s a change of $42,000 a month. That means they could have put $504,000 back into product, hiring, or runway each year. They only figured this out after hiring someone who knew MLOps.
The Secret MLOps Stack That All Startups Need
Most of the time, when people say “MLOps,” they mean the whole lifecycle. Let’s break it down into useful parts:
The thinking phase of experiment tracking
Your data scientists need to keep track of their experiments, compare models, and remember why they picked certain hyperparameters three months ago.
MLflow is the best choice for new businesses because it is free and open source.
If you host it yourself, it costs nothing. If you use a managed service, it costs about $100 to $500 a month.
Why it matters: Your team will have to retrain the same model five times with different results, and they won’t know which one was the best.
Data management and versioning (being aware of what you’re working with)
Data is always changing. You need to keep track of different versions of datasets, just like you do with Git for code. You can’t train a model again or figure out why predictions suddenly got worse without it.
For smaller datasets, the best options are DVC (data version control) or Git LFS.
Price: $0 (free and open source)
Why it matters: The quality of the data is often more important than the model’s structure. Keeping track of it pays off.
The workhorse is Model Training Orchestration.
Automating the training pipeline so that models retrain on a schedule, start up automatically when new data comes in, and don’t need someone to run a script by hand.
The best choices are Apache Airflow, Kubeflow, or Prefect.
Price: different ($0 for open-source to $10K+/month for managed services)
Why it matters: Startups often have to retrain people by hand. This is a problem. Automation changes the game.
Model Serving & Deployment (getting the model to people)
Putting an API around a trained model so that other apps can use it. This has to be dependable, quick, and able to handle spikes in traffic.
If you want to use simple REST APIs, FastAPI, BentoML, Seldon Core, or cloud-native options like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Run are your best bets.
Cost: $50 to $500 a month, depending on how much traffic you get.
Why it matters: Most new businesses make mistakes here. They send a model as a batch job instead of an API that works in real time, which hurts performance.
Monitoring and alerting (the insurance policy)
You need to know when your model starts acting up once it’s live. This means keeping an eye on how accurate predictions are, how data changes over time, how long it takes for inputs to arrive, and any strange patterns that show up.
The best choices are obviously AI, WhyLabs (for model monitoring), or making your own with Prometheus and Grafana.
Price: $0 to $1000 per month, depending on how hard it is
Why it matters: A model that fails silently costs more than one that fails loudly and wakes you up. You need systems that warn you ahead of time.
CI/CD for ML (deployments that can be done over and over again and are reliable)
Making the whole process automatic so that when new code is pushed, it starts training, validation, and deployment. This stops bad things from happening and lets you make changes quickly.
GitHub Actions (free for new businesses), GitLab CI/CD, or Jenkins are the best choices.
Price: $0 to $100 a month
Why it matters: Manual deployments are likely to go wrong. Automation takes the guesswork out of things.
MLOps Tools That Work for Startups and Are Open Source
The truth is that the most impressive MLOps stack isn’t always the best one for a startup. It’s the one that your team can really keep up with.
Forecast for the size of the global MLOps market from 2023 to 2035

MLflow: The Tool for Everything
What it does: It keeps track of experiments, handles different versions of models, and deploys models.
Why startups like it: It’s free, simple to use, and doesn’t require much time to learn. You can start with just tracking experiments and add deployment features later.
The real cost of self-hosting is about $200–300 per month for a small EC2 instance, a database, and storage. Managed services like Neptune AI or Weights & Biases cost teams between $500 and $2000 a month.
Gotcha: You need someone who knows DevOps to host your own site. If that’s not you, pay for the service.
DVC stands for Data Version Control.
What it does: It’s like Git, but for data and model files. Keep track of which model was trained on which version of your data.
Why startups love it: It’s free. Works with your current Git workflow. It saves a lot of cloud storage space by only changing what needs to be changed.
Cost in reality: $0 (open source)
It’s a command-line tool, so your team needs to know how to use the terminal.
Metaflow: Made for New Businesses
What it does: It manages ML workflows (like Airflow) with an emphasis on ease of use and low infrastructure costs.
Why startups love it: Netflix made it just for them to deal with their ML scaling problems. It’s been tested in production on a huge scale, but it’s still easy for small teams to use.
Cost in reality: $0 (open source). Metaflow’s infrastructure costs are usually 40% lower than those of other options, like Kubeflow.
Tip: It works perfectly with AWS Batch and Kubernetes, so you don’t have to spend a lot of money on infrastructure.
Seldon Core: Serving Models
What it does: It puts ML models into microservices with built-in versioning and monitoring.
Why startups love it: It can do canary deployments (roll out new models to 10% of users first), A/B testing, and automatically roll back if something goes wrong.
Cost: $0 (it’s open source). Kubernetes is needed (adds about $100–300 per month).
Kubeflow: The Business Alternative
What it does: It is a full MLOps platform that runs on Kubernetes.
Startups should be careful because Kubeflow is powerful but heavy. Kubernetes is probably not worth the trouble for your startup if it isn’t already using it. Wait until you grow.
The real cost is $0 (it’s open-source), but the Kubernetes infrastructure costs between $500 and $2,000 a month.
Strategy 1: The Lean MLOps Stack ($200 to $400 a month)
If you have a small team and need to move quickly:
Self-host MLflow ($200/month on AWS) for keeping track of experiments
Data Management: DVC for versioning ($0)
For now, use cron jobs for orchestration. When you have 5 or more models, switch to Airflow.
Serving: FastAPI on AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Run ($50–100 per month)
Monitoring: Build your own with basic logging and alerts for $50 a month
In total, about $300 to $400 a month
Team size: This can be handled by one or two people.
When to upgrade: When you have 5 or more models or need latency of less than a second.
Strategy 2: The Balanced MLOps Stack (
800–800–1500 per month)
As you add more models:
Weights and Biases is a managed service that costs $500 per month to keep track of experiments.
Data Management: DVC and S3 storage for $200 a month
Orchestration: Metaflow or Airflow that is managed ($300–400 per month)
Serving: BentoML on Kubernetes (
300–300–500 per month)
Monitoring: AI or WhyLabs (obviously) for $200 to $300 a month
Total: about $1500 to $1800 a month
Team size: This can be done by 3 to 5 people.
When to upgrade: when you need compliance or governance features or when you outgrow Kubernetes
Strategy 3: The Growth MLOps Stack, which costs between $3000 and $5000 a month
When you have a lot of money and need business features:
Managed service for experiment tracking ($1000/month)
Databricks or Snowflake integration for data management costs $1500 to $2000 a month.
Managed Apache Airflow or Databricks Workflows ($1000/month) for orchestration
Serving: Deploying across multiple clouds with automatic scaling ($1000/month)
Monitoring: Enterprise monitoring with alerts and dashboards for $800 a month
In total, $5000 to $6000 a month
This can be done by a team of 8 to 12 people.
Benefit: Almost no operational problems; concentrate on models instead of infrastructure
The biggest problems with MLOps for new businesses
Why the quality of your data is more important than the design of your model
A lot of new businesses get this wrong: they spend too much time trying to decide between PyTorch, TensorFlow, and XGBoost. Their data is bad anyway, so it doesn’t matter which model they choose.
A real-life example: An e-commerce startup was able to improve the accuracy of their product recommendations by 18% just by cleaning up their data—no changes to their model. They fixed user actions that were mislabeled and made sure that all addresses were in the same format. That’s a free 18% betterment.
The lesson is that if you put in bad data, you’ll get bad data back.
In data-centric AI, the question changes from “which model is best?” to “which data quality improvements will give me the most return on investment?” This is a big change in how people think, and startups that make it win.
Steps to take:
Set up your pipeline to automatically check data for missing values, outliers, and schema changes.
Keep an eye on both model metrics and data quality metrics.
If your data needs labels, put money into labeling (this is where problems with quality often hide).
Keep an eye out for data drift in production (the real world changes, and your training data may no longer reflect it).
The Truth About MLOps Demand and Job Growth
If you’re reading this and thinking about whether or not to learn MLOps for your job, the answer is a big yes.
LinkedIn says that the number of MLOps jobs has grown by 9.8 times in the last five years. This isn’t just talk. The market is real, and the demand is growing.
A look at the job market in 2025:
The global MLOps market is expected to grow from $3.1 billion in 2024 to $124.68 billion by 2035, at a rate of 39.8% per year.
In North America, salaries range from $100,000 to $150,000 or more. In India, they range from ₹15 to ₹35 LPA.
The growth rate is 41% every year until 2027.
Companies that hire the most people are Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Databricks, H2O.ai, and fast-growing startups like NimbleBox and SimpliML.
What is making this demand? Most companies are failing to productionize AI because they don’t have the right MLOps practices. There are a lot of job openings because the talent pool hasn’t caught up with demand.
Is it worth it to learn ML in 2025?
Yes, but with some caveats.
It is worth it to learn the basics of machine learning because knowing how your models work will help you make better systems. But MLOps and ML infrastructure are where the real career growth is. These are the jobs that are in the highest demand compared to the number of people who can fill them.
To move up in your career, make these things a priority:
The basics of DevOps (Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD)
AWS, GCP, or Azure are examples of cloud platforms.
Understanding the ML lifecycle (training, deployment, and monitoring)
Scripting and automating (Bash, Python)
You don’t have to know a lot about ML theory to do well in MLOps. You need to be practical, know how systems work, and know how to put models into use.
Will AI take the place of MLOps?
No, the short answer is no.
Will AI take over some parts of MLOps? Yes. GitHub Copilot and other tools are already writing infrastructure code and deployment scripts.
Will this put an end to MLOps jobs? No. It will change them.
Cloud computing didn’t get rid of system administrators; it made new jobs like DevOps engineers. In the same way, AI will create jobs like FinOps (which helps cut down on AI costs), AIOps (which helps keep an eye on infrastructure), and ML Reliability Engineers.
Repetitive, low-value tasks like manually setting up servers will be the ones that go away. High-value roles like system design, cost optimization, reliability, and strategy will be the ones that grow the most.
You shouldn’t be learning MLOps because you want AI to take over. Learn it to make what you can do better, not to be scared of it.
The MLOps Plan That Helped Startups Get Real Customers
Let’s see how successful startups use MLOps to get ahead.
A Look at Uber’s Michelangelo Platform
Uber didn’t come up with ML; they came up with MLOps. Michelangelo, their internal platform, handles more than 5,000 models in production and makes 10 million predictions per second at peak load.
They built in these important ideas:
Deployment with one click: Anyone on the team can deploy a model without having to wait for DevOps.
Automatic versioning: Each trained model gets a version and a tag automatically.
CI/CD for ML: Changes to code and data start automated testing and deployment.
Monitoring in real time: If accuracy drops, drift detection and automatic rollback
Result: Uber can change its models faster than its competitors can. This means better suggestions, faster routing, and more money made per ride.
What startups can learn from Uber: You don’t have their money, but you can follow their philosophy. Make MLOps practices that let your small team work as quickly as big tech.
A Look at Airbnb’s Data Quality Infrastructure
Airbnb’s recommendation engine and pricing models use 50 GB of data every day. They could have said that their models were to blame for poor performance. Instead, they put money into data quality.
What they did:
Automated validation: Before training, each dataset is checked for accuracy.
Schema enforcement means that all data must be in the right format.
Finding bias: Algorithms find patterns of mistakes in labeling
Constant monitoring: Training data is always compared to production data.
Result: The rates of matches for recommendations went up. Matches between guests and hosts got better. Dynamic pricing got better at being right. This meant more people staying in the hotel and more money coming in.
Takeaway for startups: Invest in data infrastructure before you optimize your models. The return on investment is huge.
Answers to Questions That Every New Business Asks
Q1: Should we buy a platform or use open-source software?
Answer: Begin with open source. You’ll learn more, spend less, and not be stuck with one vendor. When operational costs start to slow down your team (usually when you have 10 or more models or 5 or more engineers), switch to a paid platform.
Q2: Do we really need MLOps right away?
Answer: Not on the first day, but on the first month. Retrofitting MLOps after sending out broken models costs 5 to 10 times more than building it in from the start.
Q3: Is it possible for one person to run our MLOps?
Yes, if your startup has less than five models. You need dedicated MLOps help for 5 to 20 models, which could take up 50% of someone’s time. You also need full-time specialists or a platform.
Q4: What will it cost us to set up MLOps?
Answer: $200 to $400 per month for lean setups, $1,500 to $3,000 per month for balanced setups, and $5,000 or more per month for enterprise setups. The engineering time to build and keep it up is the bigger cost, not the infrastructure. This is something that many new businesses don’t think about.
Q5: Is MLOps more difficult than DevOps?
Answer: Different, not harder. DevOps is more established and has clearer best practices. Because MLOps is newer, you often have to figure things out as you go. But the main ideas are the same: automate, keep an eye on things, make new versions, and keep improving.
Q6: Will AI take the place of MLOps engineers?
Answer: AI will take care of some of the boring parts of MLOps, like writing scripts and setting up infrastructure. But it won’t replace the experience, judgment, and decision-making that experienced MLOps engineers bring. If anything, the need for good MLOps engineers is growing, not shrinking.
Next Steps for Your Startup That Make Sense
If you’re sure but don’t know where to start:
Week 1-2: Make a plan
Check your current ML deployment (how do you get models into production now?)
Write down the things that cause the most problems (what takes the most time? What breaks the most?)
Pick a target tool stack that fits your budget and the size of your team.
Build in weeks 3 and 4
Set up tracking for your experiments (MLflow or Weights & Biases)
Set up basic CI/CD for your training code using GitHub Actions or GitLab CI.
Add monitoring to the model you use in production now.
Month 2: Size
Include data versioning (DVC)
Use Airflow or cron jobs to automate model retraining.
Set up alerts for when the model gets worse
Month 3+: Keep going
Improve infrastructure based on real problems
Only add new tools when they really help.
Write down everything (future you will be grateful to present you)
In the end, MLOps is your unfair advantage.
Most startups and MLOps don’t have it, though. Most businesses still manage models by hand, deploy them from laptops, and cross their fingers that nothing goes wrong in production.
You have an unfair advantage if you do MLOps right:
Faster iteration: You can deploy models in days instead of months.
Lower costs: You don’t have to pay for extra infrastructure that you don’t need.
Dependability: Your models don’t mysteriously get worse over time
Attracting talent: Good engineers want to work on systems that follow good practices.
It won’t help a bad model become good. But it will help your good models get to your customers and keep getting better.
Not every time, the startup with the best algorithm wins. It’s the one that can make changes the fastest, learn from real-world data, and put new models into use before its competitors even finish their spreadsheets.
That’s MLOps.
FAQ’s
Q1: What are the differences between MLOps and DevOps?
A: DevOps takes care of deploying and running software automatically. MLOps goes beyond that to include machine learning workflows, which add data versioning, model versioning, experiment tracking, and continuous retraining. MLOps focuses on both code and data, while DevOps only focuses on code. MLOps needs more advanced monitoring and automated retraining systems than traditional DevOps because ML models get worse over time because of data drift.
Q2: Is it possible for a small startup to pay for MLOps?
A: Yes, of course. You can build a full MLOps stack for $200 to $400 a month using open-source tools like MLflow, DVC, Metaflow, and FastAPI. The tools don’t cost that much; it’s the time it takes to build them. One unnecessary AWS instance costs most startups more than good MLOps practices do. Every time, smart prioritization beats fancy tools.
Q3: Should you learn MLOps for a job in 2025?
A: Yes, for sure. There are now 9.8 times as many MLOps jobs as there were five years ago, and they are expected to grow by 41% each year until 2027. Salaries can be anywhere from $100,000 to $160,000 or more. There are a lot more people who want to work in tech than there are jobs, which makes it one of the best tech careers right now. MLOps specialists are hard to find, unlike general ML engineering, which is very crowded.
Q4: Will AI take over MLOps jobs?
A: No. AI will take care of some of the work, like making scripts and setting up basic infrastructure, but it won’t take the place of making decisions about systems, strategy, and judgment. In fact, the field is making new jobs like FinOps (cost optimization) and AIOps (AI for operations). If anything, the rise of AI is making the need for skilled MLOps engineers who can handle it responsibly even greater.
Q5: Why is the quality of the data more important than the choice of model?
A: Because a perfect model trained on bad data will make bad predictions. In the real world, case studies show that improving data quality often gives 5–10 times better results than switching models. This is why top companies like Airbnb and Netflix put a lot of money into data infrastructure first. A clean dataset + simple model beats dirty dataset + complex model every single time. Your models will naturally get better if you focus on data.


